Public call for input on regulatory remedies - UKE

You are here: Home > Newsroom > Press releases > Public call for input on regulatory remedies
  • share:
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • gogole+
    • linkedin

Public call for input on regulatory remedies



=> Introduction

The new regulatory framework for electronic communications is based on the principle that regulatory action should be based on clear objectives and proportionate to identified market failures. National regulatory authorities (NRAs) have more margin of manoeuvre when deciding what regulatory remedies are appropriate than within the previous regulatory framework. Where, as a result of market analysis, NRAs find that an operator has significant market power on a specific market, they now have a range of regulatory tools available. There is the possibility for an NRA to go beyond the range of remedies available and devise alternative remedies. This very flexibility, which is the strength of the new regulatory framework, could potentially result in a range of regulatory solutions to deal with the same problems in different jurisdictions. Article 8 of the Framework directive requires NRAs to cooperate with each other and with the Commission in a transparent manner to ensure the development of consistent regulatory practice and the consistent application of  the new regulatory framework. This call for input has been elaborated by the ERG and Commission who have committed to work towards a jointly endorsed approach on remedies.

The Significant Market Power (SMP) process of the new regulatory framework is conducted in three steps:

  1. Defining relevant markets. A non-exhaustive list of markets susceptible to ex-ante regulation is set out in the Commission Recommendation on Relevant Markets . These markets must be assessed by the NRA because for these markets it has been established that the criteria for assessing the need for ex-ante regulation set out in the Recommendation on Relevant Markets have been met.
  2. Evaluating whether competition is effective by deciding  whether one or more operators  have significant market power in the relevant market.
  3. Imposing, maintaining, amending or withdrawing specific regulatory obligations on undertakings designated as having SMP. If NRAs designate undertakings as having SMP, they must impose on them one or more regulatory obligations, in accordance with the relevant Directives and taking into account the principle of proportionality.

This call for input relates to the third step. The specific regulatory obligations to  be imposed on SMP undertakings can apply either to wholesale or retail markets depending on the market identified for analysis. The remedies related to wholesale markets are set out in Articles 9 to 13 of the Access Directive. The obligations related to retail markets are set out in Articles 17 to 19 of the Universal Service Directive.

When imposing a specific obligation on an undertaking with significant market power, the NRA will need to demonstrate that the obligation in question is commensurate with the problem identified, proportionate and justified in the light of the NRA’s basic objectives as set out in the Framework Directive (Art. 8). These basic objectives require NRAs to:

  1. promote competition in the provision of electronic communications networks, electronic communications services and associated services and facilities;
  2. contribute to the development of the internal market;
  3. promote the interests of the citizens of the European Union.

The obligations which apply to wholesale markets set out in the Access Directive are: transparency (Article 9); non-discrimination (Article 10); accounting separation (Article 11), obligations for access to and use of specific network facilities (Article 12), and price control and cost accounting obligations (Article 13).  Within each of these options there are numerous variations on the remedies to be imposed, for instance price control could be calculated implemented in a number of ways. In addition, Article 8 of the Access Directive provides that NRAs may impose obligations outside this list.  In order to do so, they must seek the prior agreement of the  Commission for the remedy proposed. The Commission in turn will take a decision after seeking the advice of the Communications Committee, as to whether the NRA concerned is permitted to impose such obligations.

Obligations which apply to retail markets set out in the Universal Service Directive are: regulatory controls on retail services (Article 17), availability of the minimum set of leased lines (Article 18 and Annex VII) and carrier selection and pre-selection (Article 19). In addition there are provisions set out in Article 6 of the Access Directive which allow an NRA to impose obligations regarding Conditional Access Systems.

In addition, regulatory controls on retail services should only be imposed where national regulatory authorities consider that relevant wholesale measures or measures regarding carrier selection or pre-selection would fail to achieve the objective of ensuring effective competition and public interest.

=> Scope of the call for input

The ERG work program states that, as the new framework provides for a higher degree of flexibility when applying ex ante rules, it would be in the benefit of the EU internal market, that the ERG focuses on a thorough analysis and ideally a common position on how to approach regulation.

The common approach to be developed on the basis of this call for input should, on the one hand, be sufficiently specific to offer practical guidance and, on the other hand, avoid unnecessary rigidity and leave room for differentiation of regulation according to circumstances and markets. The ERG welcomes views on the balance between these conflicting goals.

Input can be given on a more general as well as on a more specific level. On a more general level, views are welcomed on what principles and guidelines to take into account when designing appropriate and proportionate remedies for market failures.

If you wish to give  a more detailed input please have reference to the following issues:

  1. The regulatory and competition problems that have been identified to which a remedy might be applied.
  2. Description of the regulatory and /or competition problem: this should be as detailed as necessary in order to allow an evaluation of whether a remedy would be appropriate. The actual source of the competition problems, and especially the level at which it takes place (eg wholesale/retail), should be  specified.
  3. In relation to the identified problem, the preferred action(s) to resolve the problem should be identified, including any specific characteristics of the remedy such as the cost accounting standard in the case of price control.
  4. An assessment of the effects of this action on the market, including any practical problems relating to implementation of the specific remedy.
  5. Further remarks on the proposed set of remedies.

=> Procedure for the call for input

Comments should be sent to and by 4th July 2003 and Comments should follow the structure outlined above as much as possible.

Comments will be made available to the ERG members and the Commission and  unless marked as confidential, will be published on the ERG website.

Comments should be sent in English or any other official language of the EU.


=> For more information please contact with: International Department of the URTiP, ph. (+48 22) 53 49 229.

  • Top
  • Print to PDF
  • Akordeon

    The President of the Office of Electronic Communications (President of UKE) is the national regulatory authority for the market of telecommunications and postal services. The President of UKE is also the specialised authority in the area of equipment conformity assessment, including telecommunications terminal equipment and radio equipment.

    Please read more
    Here you can find information about the most import ant international events, significant for the development of telecommunications and postal markets In Poland and for the statutory activity of the Office of Electronic Communications.
    International activity of the President of UKE consists of, inter alia, cooperation with the European Commission, other EU institutions and Regulatory Authorities of EU Member State. It includes also the cooperation within organizations of which UKE is a member, i.e. the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), the Body for European Regulators of Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the European Committee for Postal Regulation (CERP).

    Please read more
    Contact details representatives of the Office of Electronic Communications (UKE).
    Please read more
Our website uses cookies. By using our website, you consent to our use of cookies. For more information, see our Privacy Policy.
I accept the privacy and cookies policy.